Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Educational and psychological perspectives
https://doi.org/10.53730/tcsie.v3n2.24
Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, higher education, educational perspectives, educational psychology, AI literacy, self-regulated learningAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly emerged as a transformative technology in higher education, creating new opportunities for educational innovation while raising important psychological concerns. This study aims to synthesize current evidence on the educational and psychological perspectives of GenAI in higher education. A qualitative literature review approach was employed using secondary data collected from peer-reviewed journal articles, systematic reviews, conference proceedings, academic books, and official reports, with priority given to publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. The reviewed literature was analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis to identify major themes related to educational innovation, AI literacy, self-regulated learning, learning motivation, academic engagement, psychological well-being, critical thinking, technology dependence, and ethical issues. The findings indicate that GenAI enhances personalized learning, learning motivation, academic engagement, self-regulated learning, and learning effectiveness while supporting more flexible and learner-centered educational environments. However, the review also highlights psychological and educational challenges, including excessive dependence on AI, reduced critical thinking, academic integrity concerns, technology-related anxiety, and ethical issues associated with AI-assisted learning. The study further emphasizes that AI literacy and responsible pedagogical integration are essential for maximizing the educational benefits of GenAI while minimizing its psychological risks.
Downloads
References
Anders, A. D. (2025). Developing generative AI literacies through self-regulated learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100363.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62.
Crawford, J. (2024). When artificial intelligence substitutes humans in higher education: The cost of loneliness, student success, and retention. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22.
Durgungoz, A., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., & Amponsah, S. (2025). “ChatGPT is like a study buddy, a teacher and a friend”: Students’ perceptions of ChatGPT in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Faraon, M., et al. (2025). An explorative study of students' intention to use ChatGPT in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication.
Guan, L., et al. (2024). AI in informal digital English learning: A meta-analysis of its effects on proficiency, motivation, and self-regulation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100262.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Huang, W., Jiang, J., King, R. B., & Fryer, L. K. (2025). Chatbots and student motivation: A scoping review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. Advance online publication.
Jin, F., Lin, C. H., & Lai, C. (2025). Modeling AI-assisted writing: How self-regulated learning influences writing outcomes. Computers in human Behavior, 165, 108538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108538
Jo, H. (2024). From concerns to benefits: A comprehensive study of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 29.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2025). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence on student and teacher well-being: A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1498132.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & education, 56(3), 818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. (2019). Mixed methods in educational psychology inquiry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.008
Moradi, H. (2025). Integrating AI in higher education: factors influencing ChatGPT acceptance among Chinese university EFL students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 30.
Qi, X., et al. (2025). A systematic literature review on designing self-regulated learning activities with generative AI. Computers & Education, 234, 105575.
Sun, J. C.-Y., et al. (2023). Utilizing artificial intelligence to support analyzing self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107710.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15.
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 15.
Wang, K., Cui, W., & Yuan, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The impact of need satisfaction on artificial intelligence literacy mediated by self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 165.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39.
Zhu, Y., Liu, Q., & Zhao, L. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative artificial intelligence on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tennessee Community Service International of Empowerment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Tennessee Community Service International of Empowerment (TCSIE). are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant TCSIE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in TCSIE can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
